STR Quality & Supervisory Readiness

Supervisory expectation has moved. The question is no longer whether an institution has a transaction monitoring system, but whether it can demonstrate that the system is effective. That demonstration needs evidence most banks cannot produce on demand: why a threshold sits where it sits, what the last rule change did to risk coverage, how a particular alert became a filing, and how long each step of that journey took.

• 01Gives compliance leadership a live command centre: queue depth, case ageing, SLA position and the filing pipeline in one view.
• 02Drafts the case narrative, with every line traceable back to the transaction that produced it.
• 03Tracks the alert-to-STR ratio continuously, so it becomes a number that is managed rather than one discovered during an inspection.
• 04Keeps a full audit trail on every rule and threshold change, together with the simulation evidence that justified it.
• 05Produces efficacy reporting built for a supervisory conversation, not for an internal dashboard.

• Alert-to-STR ratio, tracked over time
• Turnaround from alert to filing
• Share of rule and threshold changes supported by simulation evidence
• Time required to produce a supervisory pack on request
• Consistency and completeness of case narratives